India

SC issues notice to Centre on PIL seeking appointment of regular CBI Director

March 13, 2021 04:06 PM

The Supreme Court issued notice to the Centre on Friday on a PIL filed by NGO Common cause seeking appointment of a regular CBI Director by the selection committee of the Prime Minister, Chief Justice of India and Leader of Opposition.

A Bench headed by Justice L Nageswara Rao asked the Centre to respond to the petition that questioned the government’s move to appoint an acting/interim CBI Director after the term of the previous CBI Director got over.

It posted the matter for hearing after two weeks even as advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing the NGO, submitted that the probe agency’s work was suffering.

“The government has failed to appoint the Director of CBI as per Section 4A of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 on the expiry of the term of the last incumbent Director Rishi Kumar Shukla on February 2 this year and has instead, vide order dated February 3, appointed Praveen Sinha as an interim/acting CBI Director till the appointment of new CBI Director, or until further orders,” the petition submitted.

The NGO urged the top court to direct the Centre to initiate and complete the process of selection of the CBI Director well in advance—at least one to two months before the date on which the vacancy in the post of CBI Director occurred in future.

The petitioner sought a direction to the Centre “to appoint a regular Director of CBI forthwith by following the procedure laid down in Section 4A of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946, as amended by the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013”.

Under the amended law, the CBI Director’s appointment has to be made on the recommendation of the Prime Minister, leader of the single largest Opposition party and the Chief Justice of India (or a Supreme Court judge nominated by CJI).

The petitioner referred to the top court’s 1998 verdict directing that Director CBI would have full freedom for allocation of work in the CBI including constitution of investigation teams. It had also directed that there should be a selection committee to identify a panel of names for the appointment of Director CBI, and thereafter the final selection to be made by the Appointments Committee of Cabinet.

This Court had said the CBI Director would have a fixed tenure of two years in order to ensure that ad-hocism in the appointment and functioning of CBI Director was eliminated and his independence was maintained, the NGO pointed out.

 

Have something to say? Post your comment